Date: 2004-04-27 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] f-o-n-y.livejournal.com
'out of fashion' means they will now be adopted by everyone who REALLY shouldn't be wearing them.

so yes. a ban might be an ok idea. ha.

Date: 2004-04-27 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ludomancer.livejournal.com
I'll bet Louisiana's taxpayers are thrilled to be employing this guy. "Protect us from the filthy, life-threatening undergarments!"

Date: 2004-04-27 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joeymichaels.livejournal.com
Today at Vutant, I wrote about the real fashion problem out nation is facing.

Hurray to low rides, boo to ass marketing.

Date: 2004-04-27 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] -odium-.livejournal.com
there's these chairs....

Date: 2004-04-27 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jepocity.livejournal.com
Yes well it is Lousisana. Boy am I glad to call that place home. I think the effort is more to get the boys who pull the shorts down to below their ass to show their boxers off. No real male would complain about it otherwise.

Date: 2004-04-28 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] youbutnoti.livejournal.com
This is why they are being banned: http://www.lsureveille.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/03/15/405563981f51f

not really, but it's a good reason :P

Date: 2004-04-28 11:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lexir0x.livejournal.com
i can't wait for the bible belt to ban any sexual positions but missionary. except maybe anal sex - BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN of course. because really, who wants the woman to have any pleasure?

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 11:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios